Smoking ban
Mar. 7th, 2009 02:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There's a big debate about a law inforcing a total ban of smoking in public places in NC. It seems that the people who profit off of others' addiction are trying to block the bill. I'm all for it; it'd be wonderful to go out and listen to a good band without getting up the next morning with a headache and a sore throat from breathing secondhand smoke.
Smokers, think about it; people are taking advantage of you. While you're paying good money to ruin your health and the health of your friends and relatives, tobacco executives are counting their profits and having a good laugh at your expense.
Smokers, think about it; people are taking advantage of you. While you're paying good money to ruin your health and the health of your friends and relatives, tobacco executives are counting their profits and having a good laugh at your expense.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 09:03 pm (UTC)I'm amazed that on this point, Argentina and France (both the home of heavy smokers) have banned smoking before some of the US states.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 08:44 pm (UTC)Smoking is already banned in all state vehicles and offices, but many blue collar workers have no protection.
I hate it when a group of people gather outside a building for one last puff, and I have to walk through the resulting haze.
That said, I have friends who smoke, and I love them anyway. Just wish that they'd quit!
If someone chooses to smoke, it's their business, but they shouldn't have the right to harm me while doing it.
Ooh! A good question for all of those good Christian tobacco farmers and execs: is it moral to make a profit off of killing your brethren?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 10:06 pm (UTC)It won't hurt smokers to refrain from exposing others to their deadly habit.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 10:21 pm (UTC)And if you are in a business where almost everyone smokes, it is also your choice to leave if you wish. Find another place that there is no smoking...there are plenty of both (at least there were until smoking bans went thru).
I guess I am not big on banning personal choices. If a business owner wishes to be smoke free that should be their choice not the government.
Not that smoking bans mean anything to me either way. My husband smokes and I don't. I can just see both sides of the issue, is all I am saying.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 12:41 am (UTC)This is me also!
I'm allergic to cigarette smoke and I hate being around people smoking. Smokers always seem to manage to blow smoke in my face even when I ask them politely not to.
:(
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 04:55 am (UTC):(
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 03:42 pm (UTC):/
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 11:43 pm (UTC)Given the above, and that smoking is a good bit below health neutral, best to keep it out of public places, except, sensibly, in a business that might choose to keep it - and notify to that effect.
It's a bit like helmet laws for motor cycling: a clear reduction in disease or injury in exchange for reduced "freedoms". These are philosophically, and thus politically, difficult. I'm glad to see non-smoking progress though.